home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: access1.digex.net!not-for-mail
- From: ell@access1.digex.net (Ell)
- Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada,comp.lang.c,comp.lang.c++
- Subject: Re: C/C++ knocks the crap out of Ada
- Followup-To: comp.lang.ada,comp.lang.c,comp.lang.c++
- Date: 7 Feb 1996 02:43:32 GMT
- Organization: The Universe
- Message-ID: <4f93kk$pe@news4.digex.net>
- References: <4etcmm$lpd@nova.dimensional.com> <4f4ptt$a1c@newsbf02.news.aol.com>
- NNTP-Posting-Host: access1.digex.net
- X-Newsreader: TIN [UNIX 1.3 950824BETA PL0]
-
- JRFisher (jrfisher@aol.com) wrote:
- :...
- : Truth is, Ada has its strengths and is (for certain projects) far superior
- : to any other structured language. Ada is particularly good for large-scale
- : development because a few systems engineers can (if they're good) design
- : the interfaces so that gangs of junior programmers can't screw up the
- : system and turn it into spaghetti.
- :...
-
- Setting responsibility interfaces is also the correct way for large, or
- complex projects using C++. It is also easy to specify such interfaces
- using C++. The key thing is to use an effective oo methodology for such
- projects. The Unified Method of Booch/Jacobson/Rumbaugh is the most
- employed of such methods.
-
- Elliott
-